The state tech policy battles that will rage in 2022 – Axios

Atlanta
Austin
Charlotte
Chicago
Columbus
Dallas
Denver
Des Moines
Nashville
NW Arkansas
Philadelphia
Tampa Bay
Twin Cities
Washington D.C.
Menu
Get smarter, faster about your hometown.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.
Illustration: Megan Robinson/Axios
States will ramp up the momentum they've built in tackling key tech policy priorities through 2022, speeding ahead of any potential federal legislation.
Why it matters: As Congress continues to make little tangible progress passing new rules for the tech industry, state legislatures have taken the lead in enacting new tech regulations.
What to watch: These are the tech policy fights that will play out in the states next year, according to industry watchers.
1. Privacy: Industry groups have pressed Congress to enact a comprehensive privacy law to avoid a patchwork of state regulation, but states continue to move forward while federal lawmakers tread water.
2. App store regulations: Arizona advanced a bill that would let developers in the state avoid the typical 30% fees that Apple and Google charge developers, but it ultimately failed after intense industry lobbying.
3. Speech and content moderation: Lawmakers in Florida and Texas, raising complaints that conservatives had been censored, both passed laws aimed at limiting social media companies' content moderation practices — but those laws were blocked by the courts.
4. Digital taxes: Maryland in 2021 became the first state to pass a law taxing revenue that large tech companies generate from showing online ads to state residents.
5. Cybersecurity risks: Maryland and Minnesota considered bills in 2021 that would study cybersecurity risks, and New York considered a data breach notification bill. In total, 21 states considered cybersecurity-related legislation in 2021.
Meanwhile, tech trade groups are following the action, beefing up their lobbying operations in the states.
The bottom line: "There is not the internet of Texas. There is not the internet of Maine. There is the internet. And a lot of these issues should be dealt with at the federal level," Edmonson said.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
IBM has resurrected its sale process for IBM Watson Health, with hopes of fetching more than $1 billion, people familiar with the situation tell Axios.
Why it matters: Big Blue wants out of health care, after spending billions to stake its claim, just as rival Oracle is moving big into the sector via its $28 billion bet for Cerner.
Illustration: Brendan Lynch/Axios
David Wasserman has seen enough. The litigation-strewn process for drawing new House lines for November's midterms will go on for months.
January 6th Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) speak to the media after a hearing. Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
The House's January 6th Committee is considering rare prime-time hearings to help build a maximum audience for testimony about what happened during the Capitol riot, one year ago tomorrow.
Why it matters: The committee sees its eyewitnesses as building a "case" to combat doubts raised by former President Trump and his Republican allies.
Sign up for Mike Allen’s daily Axios AM and PM newsletters to get smarter, faster on the news that matters.
Please enter a valid email.
Please enter a valid email.

source